Motions of Grace

Intersections of scripture and life

A conservative guy reviews left-of-center music: “Merry Go ‘Round”

 

Song: “Merry Go ‘Round”

Artist: Kacey Musgraves

Album: “Same Trailer, Different Park” (2012)

Genre: Country


Kacey Musgraves’s 2012 portrait of working-class, or maybe lower-middle-class, ennui is poignant almost to the point of painful. Though Musgraves herself is a liberal, her song pairs well with noted libertarian Kevin D. Williamson’s indispensable essay on Appalachia, which he dubs the “Big White Ghetto.”

Unlike the other songs reviewed here so far, Musgrave’s piece lacks an explicit villain (except for maybe “tradition”). Life in flyover country is just monotonous and dissatisfying in her narrative world. You get married from boredom, you have kids (by 21 years old) because that’s what one does, and you raise them in “tiny little boxes in a row” in some small town or suburb. You smoke some marijuana, commit adultery, and/or go to church to try and cope.

Early on in Friday Night Lights (2004), the best sports movie ever made, some players for the Permian High football team are hanging out at a restaurant. A Permian alum walks up to them and exhorts them to “get you one of these,” as he gestures to his own championship ring. Afterwards, he says, “there’s nothing but babies and memories.”

Of course, the reality is more complex than this. Most of my own experience in small towns and rural areas has been positive. I still sometimes miss living in Clinton County, Illinois. On the other hand, “deaths of despair,” i.e., deaths from alcohol, drugs or suicide, are very real, and they tend to affect rural communities disproportionately. Poverty per simpliciter can only be a partial explanation, especially seeing that, like, Mississippi is probably better off than the United Kingdom on a per capita basis. Musgraves, interestingly, doesn’t even mention poverty directly. For her, what’s wrong is something almost spiritual in nature, but it’s not something you can fix by going to church (she suspects that a lot of folks in the pews don’t believe the Nicene Creed in their heart of hearts). Besides, the “tradition” of marriage and family that church enforces stifles any opportunities to escape the Permian Basins of the world, or else the creativity necessary to revitalize them.

In reality, working-class white people increasingly neither get married nor go to church. Bucking “tradition,” however, has not led to a widespread rural renaissance. It’s not entirely clear what would. The recent phenomenon of “reshoring,” i.e., companies bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US, might help. What won’t help is the further atomization of American society. Nor will right-wing radicalization, which corresponds with a decline in church attendance.

Church can stifle; it can also provide life-saving community and purpose. Getting rid of it doesn’t make the world less heartless (Marx). In my opinion, the greatest challenge (and opportunity) facing the American church right now is to rearticulate the gospel in a way that begins rural people back into the fold. Radicalized politics and drug usage are just the “same trailer, different park.” What’s needed is some combination of economic opportunity and spiritual renewal.

A conservative guy reviews left-of-center music: “I Ain’t Got No Home”

Song: “I Ain’t Got No Home”

Artist: Woody Guthrie

Album: Dust Bowl Ballads (1940)

Genre: Folk

Featured image is “Dust Bowl, Cimarron County, Oklahoma,” by Arthur Rothstein (April, 1936)


In the 1930’s, a combination of severe drought and bad farming practices led to the “Dust Bowl,” vast dust storms that devastated large swaths of the American Midwest, already reeling from the Great Depression. Among the thousands of “Okies” who traveled west in a desperate search for work was one Woodrow Wilson “Woody” Guthrie.

Guthrie, already a talented musician, eventually found a spot in Los Angeles’s music industry. He made a point to visit migrants living in camps (“Hoovervilles”) throughout California. At one such camp, the story goes, he encountered the folk hymn “Can’t Feel at Home,” which had been recorded by the Carter Family in 1931. “Can’t Feel at Home” traverses territory familiar to so much of American folk music: that this transitory life is a sojourning on the way to our true home in heaven. 

But Guthrie wasn’t having it. Using the same folk idiom and the same theme of homelessness, Guthrie nonetheless bypasses the solace of religion in his “I Ain’t Got No Home.” There may or may not be a world “beyond the blue,” as the Carters sang, but we know for sure that there is trouble in this one. In between harmonica riffs — the harmonica is always weirdly cheerful in a melancholic way — Guthrie’s narrator sings of a world of sharecropping, repossessions, privation.  

And this world has its villains. A “rich man,” likely a banker, took the narrator’s house when the latter couldn’t make payments. As he wanders from place to place seeking employment, the local police give him trouble. Guthrie’s narrator is a working man in a society stacked against working men: “The gambling man is rich /  and the working man is poor.” The American Dream, it turns out, is nothing more than a dream. There is no place for him, never mind how hard he tries. 

In recent weeks, some cultural commentators have drawn parallels between Guthrie and Oliver Anthony’s chart-topping “Rich Men North of Richmond.” Like Guthrie, Anthony has lost faith in the idea that working men can get ahead in this country. His titular ‘rich men,’ however, are those of a particular sort: namely, the inhabitants of Washington, D.C., who tax his dollars (which already “ain’t s–t” due to inflation) and distribute them to obese good-for-nothings presumably in exchange for votes. It’s worth noting here that Anthony’s scorn appears to be bipartisan — he has, for instance, expressed disdain for Republican politicians who have sought to co-opt his breakout hit. 

For Guthrie, though, the problem is even more fundamental. It’s a “great and a funny” world, not in any positive sense, that systematically disadvantages working people in a way that no tax reform would fix. In Guthrie’s world, the owners (of mines, land, capital) win, and the rest lose. Between them a great gulf has been fixed, one that cannot be crossed without (at a minimum) strong labor unions. 

As Marx noted, capitalism’s problem is not a lack of productivity. It’s ridiculously productive. It lifted South Korea, for example, from a medieval farming culture into a highly developed economy in six decades. Capitalism’s problem is that it necessarily creates winners and losers. And by no means are the “losers” stupid or lazy people. Ron Swanson’s famous dictum that “capitalism is God’s way of deciding who is smart and who is poor” is funny, but it’s simplistic and dangerous politics when taken literally. The fact is that market liberalization enriches a society as a whole while leaving behind individuals, sometimes in large numbers. 

Conservatives are suspicious of mass overhauls of the American economic system — and rightly so, given that forced redistributions tend to be disastrous. What they must do, however, is imagine what it’s like to be the “losers.” It might not even be that hard to imagine — very little of what I do for a living, for example, could not be automated with currently existing technologies. Artists like Guthrie can help here, telling the story of earnest and hardworking people whose skills and abilities are, for whatever reason, not in sufficient demand. Markets work, but they do not work for all people at all times. That’s just a fact. To be conservative, as Michael Oakeshott pointed out, is not blind devotion to an ideology; it’s trying to hold on to what is good about a society (with a certain degree of awe that it has come to exist at all) while incrementally and carefully improving what is bad.

A conservative guy reviews left-of-center music: “Whitey on the Moon”

Song: Whitey on the Moon

Artist: Gil Scott-Heron

Album: Small Talk (1970) 

Genre: Spoken Word 

Content Warning: Profanity. 


It was an inspired if anachronistic move to include a segment from Gil Scott-Heron’s “Whitey on the Moon” in the excellent, if overly melancholic First Man (2018). Scott-Heron was not the only, or even the first, person to criticize the United States’s massive expenditures on the Apollo program in the face of its equally massive social problems [1], but he does so with exceptional verve and style. 

“I can’t pay no doctor bill (but Whitey’s on the moon).” Scott-Heron delivers this line beautifully — it isn’t rage in his voice, nor even exactly righteous indignation. It’s not even the same thing as people getting mad at Jeff Bezos for going to space while his warehouse workers fall asleep on their feet from exhaustion. It’s an ancient exasperation, tinged with a finely-tuned sense of irony, of being asked to celebrate the triumphs of a culture that would not find a place for him, that had, for centuries, made “great leaps” at the expense of his people. 

Now, Apollo was a triumph, a staggering feat of ingenuity and courage. It was, and is, a source of national pride and even identity. To have it written off as rich white people playing games is unpleasant — but it’s a good, Old Testament kind of unpleasantness. The kind that can get a person to sit up and pay attention. The kind that teaches us that national pride does not exclude national repentance, and that national repentance does not obliterate national pride. 


A couple of years ago I took my oldest daughter to a local coffee shop, which had some books for children. I picked one out and started reading it to her. The book was called Ron’s Big Mission, about a nine-year-old Black boy in 1950’s South Carolina who loved to read science books at his local library. He was prohibited from checking these books out — until one day he decided that he would not leave the premises without them. The police (for the love of mercy) were eventually called. Finally, the absurdity of the situation impressed itself on the adults, and Ron finally got his own library card. 

The epilogue stated that Ron was Ronald E. McNair, who earned his PhD in physics and eventually became America’s second Black astronaut. On January 28, 1986, he and six others slipped the surly bonds of earth and touched the face of God. At this point I was choking back sobs and my daughter had moved on to Elmo, which was totally fair. 

America, the horror and the glory. 


[1] See also, “Reader’s Digest,” by Larry Norman.

A Conservative Guy Reviews Left-of-Center Music: “Working Class Hero”


Song: “Working Class Hero”

Artist: John Lennon

Album: John Lennon / Plastic Ono Band (1970)

Genre: Folk

Content Warning: The original recording (as opposed to the radio edit) contains profanity.


Synopsis:

The B-side to the ubiquitous “Imagine,” “Working Class Hero” sheds the cloying sentimentality of the former and gets down to serious political business. It’s just Lennon and his guitar, strumming three chords and railing against a nameless “they” (presumably the cultural and political elite) who exert an ever-present downward pressure on working people. “They” inflict physical violence and humiliation at school; “they” ensure that you choose an inoffensive career; and “they” feed you a steady diet of religion, sex and TV to render you easily-managed.

While the Brits have always been more class-conscious than us Americans, Lennon’s offering continues to touch a nerve 50 years later and from across the Atlantic – not least because recent political developments [1] have ushered socioeconomic class (in particular, the white working class) back into the national conversation.

What’s cool about it:

I dunno. I’m a sucker for a guy alone with his acoustic guitar. And it’s got a nice hammer-on pick too.

For my money, Lennon is more compelling when he paints dystopias rather than utopias. Was everything about his upbringing orchestrated by dark powers to keep him down? Probably not – but he obviously feels like it was, and he succeeds in having “you” feel the weight of a societal deck stacked against you. Bad schools, difficult home life, constrained job opportunities – and there is “no time” to develop the internal resources necessary to overcome all this stuff. In a particularly effective line, Lennon scoffs at the notion of the “room at the top” that “they” promise the masses beneath. He is less wrong than I would like him to be. While reports of the death of upward mobility are frequently exaggerated, it’s equally true that it has become harder for children to earn more than their parents [2].

But Lennon does not reserve his scorn solely for “them.” He does not feel sorry for “you” either, as you delude yourself into thinking you’ve beaten the system merely by spouting bits of leftist ideology. For all your cleverness and sloganeering, he growls, you remain “peasants as far as I can see.” Nothing less than heroism, of an admittedly unspecified sort, is what the hour calls for. Perhaps in the post-revolutionary world-to-come there will be “nothing to kill or die for,” but in this present evil age we must be heroes.

Conservative reactionary stuff:

The Left is generally suspicious of Great Man theories of history, in which remarkable individuals (rather than mass social movements) shape the course of human events. It’s thus just a bit ironic that Lennon feels compelled to use the language of “heroes,” by definition individuals who accomplish great and admirable things. The forward march of human progress, he senses, has somehow gotten stuck, requiring remarkable exploits by a chosen few to get things moving again. Perhaps he himself could lead the charge: “If you want to be a hero, well, just follow me.”

And why not? If “they” broke it, then “you” can fix it. It just requires detoxing from the cocktail of religion, sex and TV that “they” have forced upon you. Of course, the particular “dope” Lennon decried in 1970 seems a little quaint now, particularly with regard to religion; we now know, pace Marx, that opiates are the real opium of the masses.

More importantly, Lennon implicitly assumes that if “you” win, then you necessarily dismantle the system, usher in a classless society and bring about the world that “Imagine,” uh, imagines. But, for me, it’s hard to imagine a world in which “you” can avoid becoming “them.” There’s a Cold War-era Russian joke in which the Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev is showing off his collection of fancy foreign cars to his mother. “That’s great, son,” replies his mom, “but what will you do if the Communists come back?”


[1] Trump, obviously, but also things like the college admission scandals.

[2] The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940 | Science Magazine

On fraud

I do not believe that voter fraud was widespread enough to justify invalidating the results of the 2020 presidential election. I also know a lot of morally earnest people, including many of my brothers and sisters in Christ, who do. We will no doubt continue to argue over the details, but in the meantime this situation raises a pastoral point I’d like to explore. One day the political tables might turn, after all, and I want to think through how to respond to a situation in which I believe my own interests are being defrauded. 

In 1 Corinthians 6, the apostle Paul is exasperated with Corinthian believers who are dragging each other to court (“and before unbelievers, at that!”). No matter who wins in court, the church loses. Preferable to providing such a spectacle to the unbelieving world is to simply accept the loss of one’s property and status: “Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be defrauded?” (v 7). 

It’s obvious that expressing disagreement with the results of a presidential election isn’t the same thing as filling a lawsuit against another Christian. At the same time, Paul articulates a principle here that helps us think about how we express that kind of disagreement: our priority in all situations – even when fighting fraud – is to avoid damaging the reputation of Christ. At a minimum, this means doing one’s research carefully (and refraining from making strong statements before doing that research), and, even more importantly, to treat one’s opponents with respect. 

Someone might counter, “The stakes are so high for the future of our country that we’re justified in dispensing with niceties. The enemy must be exposed and defeated.” This gets us into the question of where our ultimate loyalties lie as believers. Simply put, no matter how high the stakes are for the USA, the stakes for the kingdom of God are always higher. Nothing can make up for driving people away from Jesus with our behavior and attitude. 

This is true even if we fancy ourselves to be fighting for the rights of the marginalized against the powerful. Giving into impulses to display scorn, fury, vindictiveness (and even, God forbid, physical violence) does no one any favors in the long term. There is simply no exception clause to “love your enemies.” In its infinite wisdom, Scripture urges us to never lose sight of the fact that our real enemy is Satan, who delights in sowing discord and hatred regardless of the cause. 

Again, this little note is mostly for myself. One day I, too, will be furious at some perceived underhanded behavior on the part of my cultural opponents. I can only hope some brother or sister will love me enough to throw these words back in my face. 

On being conservative

It’s more useful to think of political conservatism as an impulse rather than as an ideology. Specifically, it’s the impulse to preserve what is good about our present social, political and cultural arrangements, or at least to limit harm when those arrangements inevitably change.


In my sense, then, there are no conservative beliefs as such. “Abortion is wrong,” for example, is a belief that a person might try to use to influence society in either a conservative or non-conservative manner.
Continue reading

What is Motions of Grace?

Motions of Grace has been born from the realization that we live in a fallen world that drives us to love extremes. The world is messy. Right and wrong is not as clear as we want it be. Knowing what to do, what to believe, and what to stand for in this ever-escalating age is mind boggling. Navigating a world which displays an endless array of shades of gray makes the temptation to cling blindly to black and white principles incredibly enticing.

But the call to follow Jesus Christ comes with the command to rely on the Holy Spirit in all things. With it brings  the challenge to have courage to stand in the middle of the uncertainty and messy circumstances that we might do his will. We may be called to react differently in two circumstances that seem almost identical. One small factor may change our entire response. We are not in control. We are not in charge. We do not set the course. And we forget that this is exactly what we signed up for.

If we call Christ Lord and we choose to follow him we have to be in active relationship. You cannot follow someone without movement, staying anchored to rigid perception. Memories of relationship, knowledge of Christian principles, or our own sense of morality apart from him simply won’t do. Rules apart from the living heart of God are empty (see how Jesus speaks to the Pharisees).

Letting go is scary. It takes that which God desires most…FAITH.

As we follow our Lord in this difficult yet joyful dance, we must ask ourselves if we are willing to accept:

  • Our smallness and rely on his strength as Lord?
  • The guidance of the Holy Spirit more than our own black/white morality?
  • Walking into uncertainty, trusting Him in each moment?
  • Listening to God and others intently before we speak?
  • Being a part of God’s story, rather than the star of our own?
  • Leaning on Him alone for our daily security, purpose, and direction?

Motions of Grace is the brain child of the Clay family as we seek to navigate a world turned on its head by Covid-19. The black hole of division we see in all sources of media (our primary means of staying connected in social distancing) has been wearying our hearts.

We want this to be a place where people are encouraged. That we come together and embrace the pain, sorrow, suffering, and confusion with courage and not fear. That together we do the hard work of discernment through the Holy Spirit so that we can be faces of reconciliation in a world cowering behind empty platitudes.

So what does this ministry look like? WE HAVE NO IDEA! But it will probably include videos, devos, blogs, and posts designed to bring us together in ways that challenge our fears and instill surrendering to Christ. Also likely videos of us trying to teach spiritual truths to our toddler who has no interest in recognizing anyone’s reign but her own!

Dirty money: the parable of the dishonest manager

like, literally dirty money

He also said to the disciples, “There was a rich man who had a manager, and charges were brought to him that this man was wasting his possessions. And he called him and said to him, ‘What is this that I hear about you? Turn in the account of your management, for you can no longer be manager.’ And the manager said to himself, ‘What shall I do, since my master is taking the management away from me? I am not strong enough to dig, and I am ashamed to beg. I have decided what to do, so that when I am removed from management, people may receive me into their houses.’ So, summoning his master’s debtors one by one, he said to the first, ‘How much do you owe my master?’ He said, ‘A hundred measures of oil.’ He said to him, ‘Take your bill, and sit down quickly and write fifty.’ Then he said to another, ‘And how much do you owe?’ He said, ‘A hundred measures of wheat.’ He said to him, ‘Take your bill, and write eighty.’ The master commended the dishonest manager for his shrewdness. For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light. And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous wealth, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal dwellings.

Luke 16:1-9, ESV


At some point in college I watched all three of the Ocean’s movies, those of George Clooney putting together and deploying an elite team of casino robbers, in one sitting. There’s certainly a bit of cognitive dissonance involved in rooting for professional thieves,* but the filmmakers do their best to smooth this over by (1) portraying the casino owners as really bad dudes, and, more importantly, by (2) focusing on the purely technical aspects of robbing casinos. 

Indeed, the Ocean’s trilogy works because one can appreciate the art and science of robbing casinos without signing off on the morality thereof. The same principle holds true for other kinds of high-cognitive (and usually nonviolent) crime – see, for instance, Catch Me if You Can, which traces the exploits of scam genius Frank Abagnale. In general, it’s hard to suppress admiration for ingenuity, even when it’s employed in the service of bad ends.

Continue reading

Burying the talent (Mt 25:14-30)

parable of the talents

Woodcut illustration of the parable of the talents (1712)

I have to confess, Jesus’ parable of the talents (Mt 25:14-30; for the extended cut see Lk 19:11-27) was one of my least favorite passages of scripture for a long time. The point seemed straightforward enough: if you waste your God-given potential, then bad things are going to happen to you. 

That certainly didn’t feel like “good news.” The story came across as divine sanction of the ever-present cultural message to do more and be better, like a religious version of a Nike commercial. To continue the financial metaphor that gives the parable its shape, God is expecting a good return on his investment, so you had better produce. But sometimes our lives are a bear market, if not an outright depression – and, in any case, how do we know when we’re producing enough? The two good servants in the parable each posted 100% returns, after all, which is a tall order even in the best of times. 

Continue reading

In the darkness

My two-year-old daughter is becoming a prolific song-writer, churning out original material on a near-daily basis. My favorite composition of hers (so far) is “Super Kitty,” but a close second is her very recent work, “In the Darkness.” It’s to be sung in a major key, joyfully. The lyrics are as follows: 

In the darkness

In the darkness

My darkness 

And your darkness

Yay!  

“In the Darkness” is, to my mind, a Christmas song, and a masterful one at that. Like all great Christmas songs, it sentimentalizes nothing. The world is indeed a dark place: greed, power politics and tribalism together go a really long way to explaining the twists and turns of human history. Cynicism works pretty well here, and the Herods of the world generally figure out a way to rise to the top. 

Continue reading

« Older posts

© 2024 Motions of Grace

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑